I often see questions answered with a one line "Rabbi XYZ wrote an informing article about this on blog ABC". Though the link may answer the question, should this style of answering be viewed as less than ideal (especially considering that the link can be taken down).

How do people feel about a standard of: One paragraph summary and/or excerpt of article, giving link along with attribution to the original author?

link
feedback

1 Answer

I wrote a guideline along these lines for mi.yodeya. I'm adapting it here mostly verbatim as a proposed guideline for this site. I'm community-wikifying it to invite edits from the community, or feel free to draft an alternative as another answer.

(And yes, it's fine that I'm copying it verbatim, since, among other potential justifications, it's my writing.)


"One who says something in the name of its speaker brings redemption to the world" (Avot 6:6).

Frequently, an answer to a question on this site, or information that can contribute to an answer, is available verbatim on some other website or in print. This guideline addresses how the responsible user should make use of such external content.

  • At a minimum, always provide a reference to the external material.

  • If it's on a website, your reference will be much more helpful if it includes a link.

    Use the link button (globe with an arrow) or see here.

  • Even more helpful would be to also summarize, in your own words, what the external material says.

    This helps people get an idea of the answer you're presenting, and also helps them decide whether to follow your reference.

  • If there are parts of the external material that would be best quoted in their original language to enhance your summary, you may quote small excerpts, as long as you make it clear that they're quotations using quotation marks or blockquoting.

    To do blockquoting, use the button that looks like quotation marks or see here. Be careful when pasting in text; you might need to add some line spacing to make it look right.

  • If you feel that it's worth reading the entire original piece, it's nice to recommend as much.

Please comply with this policy in all of your posts on this site. We are not lawyers, but our understanding of American copyright law is that copying entire pieces without permission, even with attribution, is a violation of the original author/owner's copyright. In addition, we feel that it's just not fair for this site to use other people's work to drive traffic to our website rather than to the original author/owner's.

link
Hmm... "Even more helpful would be to also summarize, in your own words, what the external material says." Not following your own advice? – yydl May 15 '11 at 20:41
1  
Pun intended. :) Will edit to bring up to spec soon. – Isaac Moses May 15 '11 at 20:57
1  
Quoting external material copies the material, which we should be careful about, but summarizing it introduces risk of error (perhaps the summarizer misunderstands), which risks spreading misinformation in the name of somebody else. It's a hard balance; because I am not a scholar I tend to err on the side of quoting, perhaps incorrectly. – Monica Cellio Jun 7 '11 at 22:33
feedback

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged